Scaling Love

Socialism, in its purest form, is indeed the economic structure of a loving family. Parents (the providers) work, sacrifice, and allocate resources not according to strict merit or output, but according to need. The toddler gets fed even though he contributes nothing; the teenager going through a growth spurt gets larger portions; the elderly grandparent receives care long after she can no longer produce. No one keeps a ledger. No one resents the “net consumers” because unbreakable bonds of love transform self-sacrifice into joy rather than grievance. The family works as a miniature socialist commonwealth because affection is infinite, information is perfect (parents intuitively know who is truly needy versus lazy), and exit is almost impossible—you don’t “divorce” your deadbeat brother or needy child without shattering your own identity.

Scale that same system beyond the ring of intimate love and everything breaks.

1. The Love Problem
Sacrificial compassion is not a scalable resource because eventually you sacrifice to death. Oxytocin doesn’t flood your brain when you contemplate the needs of 330 million strangers the way it does when your own child cries. God seems to have wired us for intense care inside the tribe of roughly 150 people we can know personally and for wary reciprocity or indifference beyond it. Socialism asks us to treat distant strangers with the same selfless devotion we show our children. That is psychologically unnatural for the overwhelming majority of human beings. Charity remains possible at scale; forced pseudo-familial obligation does not.

2. The Information Problem
Inside a family, providers have near-perfect information. A mother knows whether her teenager is genuinely depressed or just binge-watching TikTok. At the scale of a nation-state, central planners (or even voters) have almost zero reliable knowledge about millions of individual circumstances. The result is a system that rewards the loudest sob stories, the most skilled political operators, and the best forgers of disability claims, while quietly punishing quiet competence and unreported struggle.

3. The Incentive Problem
In a family, social pressure and love keep free-riding within bounds. Your deadbeat cousin might crash on the couch for two weeks, not two decades, because eventually even Grandma will say something. In a large-scale socialist system, the providers and the dependents rarely inhabit the same social circles. The provider class pays taxes into a faceless bureaucracy; the dependent class receives benefits from the same faceless bureaucracy. Shame evaporates. Resentment festers. The tragedy of the commons in human effort appears: everyone has an incentive to exaggerate their need and minimize their contribution, because the costs are diffused across millions of strangers they will never meet and the benefits are concentrated on themselves and their immediate circle.

4. The Selection Problem
Over Time
Here is the cruelest part: systems that reward dependency and punish (or fail to adequately reward) provision selectively breed for more dependents and fewer providers. Over generations, the responsible ants subsidize the grasshoppers until there aren’t enough ants left to carry the load. You see it in shrinking labor-force participation rates, exploding disability rolls, and cultures where “working class” increasingly means “formerly working class.” The family doesn’t face this problem because children eventually grow up and (in healthy families) become providers themselves. National socialism has no such built-in maturation mechanism.

5. The Coercion Problem
A family is held together by voluntary love. When love fails, the family fractures painfully but peacefully. State socialism is held together by coercion—taxes collected at gunpoint, borders controlled by force, dissent criminalized as “wrecking” or “hoarding” or “hate speech.” The moment you replace voluntary giving with taking, you have already admitted that the familial model cannot scale. You are no longer running on love; you are running on fear.

In short: socialism works in families because families run on love, perfect information, unbreakable bonds, and tiny scale. Outside those conditions it becomes a machine that slowly converts human beings into political capital, responsibility into resentment, and citizens into competing factions of entitled dependents screaming at a shrinking pool of exhausted providers. The proof is not in theory but in the graveyard of 20th-century experiments and the slow-motion crisis of every generous welfare state watching its productive base erode while its promises expand.

Family does not scale without love. That is the entire story.